Science is broken: Illustrations from Retraction Watch
Posted by Henry Bauer on 2017/12/21
I commented before about Science is broken: Perverse incentives and the misuse of quantitative metrics have undermined the integrity of scientific research. The magazine The Scientist published on 18 December “Top 10 Retractions of 2017 —
Making the list: a journal breaks a retraction record, Nobel laureates Do the Right Thing, and Seinfeld characters write a paper”, compiled by Retraction Watch. It should be widely read and digested for an understanding of the jungle of unreliable stuff nowadays put out under the rubric of “science”.
See also “Has all academic publishing become predatory? Or just useless? Or just vanity publishing?”
Leave a Reply